Why Medical Advancements Without Morals Fall Short of True Care

Former jockey Michael Straight regained his ability to walk using the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, a $100,000 device that enabled him to take over 371,000 steps despite being paralyzed from the waist down. When the exoskeleton malfunctioned after five years, the manufacturer initially refused repairs, citing policy. Media pressure led to the repair, highlighting ethical concerns about profit-driven decisions in medical technology. The story underscores the need for moral frameworks in technological innovation, emphasizing that care must prioritize human dignity, as shaped by Christian principles, over financial or utilitarian goals.

Updated Dec 11, 2024
Why Medical Advancements Without Morals Fall Short of True Care

BreakPoint.org

Thanks to a $100,000 medical device known as the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, former jockey Michael Straight learned to walk again five years after being paralyzed from the waist down following a horseback riding accident. By supporting his limbs and artificially moving his legs, the machine has helped Straight return to a more normal life. He has since taken 371,091steps. 

However, this past summer, a small wire came loose and caused the exoskeleton to stop working. When Straight asked the company for technical support to fix the device, he was told they did not service machines more than five years old. Straight was shocked, telling a horse-racing news outlet,  

It’s not fair to people like me, as hard as a paraplegic’s life is, and they’re making it harder. … I just don’t understand how they can say that after five years, a $100,000 machine is not worth anything. That’s very hard to believe. 

Thankfully, with the help of media coverage, the company changed course and repaired Straight’s walking device. They did not, however, commit to future repairs, leaving Straight and others like him at the mercy of technicians and company policies.  

In other words, despite all the promise of medical and technological miracles (and AI for that matter), the human factor remains. In his masterful book Abolition of Man, C.S. Lewis offered an essential tempering on the hype of technological progress. Modern man’s conquest of nature is not as neutral as is often claimed. “What we call Man’s power over Nature,” he wrote, “turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument.”  

The greater power some men have the greater potential for corruption. Lord Acton’s observation that “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” applies whether the power achieved is political or technological. According to Straight, ReWalk’s refusal to repair their own machine was a “pathetic excuse for a bad company to make more money,” but there’s more to this story than just greed. As one consumer rights advocate put it,  

This is the dystopian nightmare that we’ve … entered in, where the manufacturer perspective on products is that their responsibility completely ends when it hands it over to a customer. 

No matter how marvelous or efficient or miraculous, all interactions and transactions with other human beings—technological or not—must be shaped by recognizing people as the image bearers of God they are. Any technological advances without that moral framework can never deliver true care. Instead, care will be redefined to a new definition of humanity. This definition, Lewis thought, would come from “men who have sacrificed their own share in traditional humanity in order to devote themselves to the task of deciding what ‘Humanity’ shall henceforth mean.” 

The Christian conviction that all people possess intrinsic dignity not only gave birth to modern medical care but also shaped how it was to be done. And, a study by the Acton Institute found that Catholic and church-owned healthcare systems were “significantly more likely to provide higher quality care and efficiency.” Untethering medicine from Christian ideas will have consequences. The same will be true of medical technologies. 

Like medical doctors, medical tech companies should take a sort of Hippocratic Oath. “First, do no harm” would be a good place to start. 

Photo Courtesy:©Sasin Tipchai/Pixabay

Published Date: December 11, 2024

John Stonestreet is President of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, and radio host of BreakPoint, a daily national radio program providing thought-provoking commentaries on current events and life issues from a biblical worldview. John holds degrees from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (IL) and Bryan College (TN), and is the co-author of Making Sense of Your World: A Biblical Worldview.

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of CrosswalkHeadlines.


BreakPoint is a program of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. BreakPoint commentaries offer incisive content people can't find anywhere else; content that cuts through the fog of relativism and the news cycle with truth and compassion. Founded by Chuck Colson (1931 – 2012) in 1991 as a daily radio broadcast, BreakPoint provides a Christian perspective on today's news and trends. Today, you can get it in written and a variety of audio formats: on the web, the radio, or your favorite podcast app on the go.

SHARE

Christianity / Newsletters / BreakPoint / Why Medical Advancements Without Morals Fall Short of True Care